Comments on: Dishonest journalism http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/ Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:02:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: kim http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-25 kim Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:56:53 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-25 You can take the son out of Kent, but you kent take the sun out of climate. ================================ You can take the son out of Kent, but you kent take the sun out of climate.
================================

]]> By: kim http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-24 kim Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:25:10 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-24 Anyone for brewing coffee and making jokes? ========================== Anyone for brewing coffee and making jokes?
==========================

]]> By: Jan Dawson http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-22 Jan Dawson Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:24:31 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-22 Update - Tim Patterson has just replied and confirmed - as suspected - that his views were accurately represented. See separate post <a href="http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/11/dishonest-journalism-part-2/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Update - Tim Patterson has just replied and confirmed - as suspected - that his views were accurately represented. See separate post here.

]]> By: rightsideup blog » Blog Archive » Dishonest journalism - part 2 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-21 rightsideup blog » Blog Archive » Dishonest journalism - part 2 Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:23:30 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-21 [...] previous post took the IBD to task for misrepresenting the views of one scientist - Ken Tapping - in its article [...] [...] previous post took the IBD to task for misrepresenting the views of one scientist - Ken Tapping - in its article [...]

]]> By: Jan Dawson http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-20 Jan Dawson Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:40:22 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-20 Thanks for the various comments. The other was indeed Tim Patterson, who hasn't responded as yet (though from what I've read about him elsewhere it appears he's more likely to support the thesis of the article). Thanks for the various comments. The other was indeed Tim Patterson, who hasn’t responded as yet (though from what I’ve read about him elsewhere it appears he’s more likely to support the thesis of the article).

]]> By: kim http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-19 kim Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:48:06 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-19 Read more, Steve. Or better. ========== Read more, Steve. Or better.
==========

]]> By: Steve Bloom http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-18 Steve Bloom Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:59:59 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-18 kim, Pappalardo does indeed quote Tapping, but if you read carefully you'll see the passages anticpating short-tern and/or major solar cooling are not attributed to Tapping. Of course Svalgaard has approximately the same position as Tapping, as he has made entirely clear on the CA threads. kim, Pappalardo does indeed quote Tapping, but if you read carefully you’ll see the passages anticpating short-tern and/or major solar cooling are not attributed to Tapping. Of course Svalgaard has approximately the same position as Tapping, as he has made entirely clear on the CA threads.

]]> By: Tilo Reber http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-17 Tilo Reber Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:30:06 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-17 You said that you sent emails off to 2 people that were used in the article. I assume that the other one was R. Timothy Patterson. What did he say? While Tapping seems to be cited, Patterson is quoted. You said that you sent emails off to 2 people that were used in the article. I assume that the other one was R. Timothy Patterson. What did he say? While Tapping seems to be cited, Patterson is quoted.

]]> By: kim http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-16 kim Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:13:08 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-16 Moderator, if you want to know what's going on about solar climate connections read the three Svalgaard threads at Climateaudit.org. That's a lot of comments, now, and they are often very dense. For the Cliff's Noters, especially examine Pete's graph in comment #454 of the Svalgaard #2 thread, and surrounding commentary. ========================== Moderator, if you want to know what’s going on about solar climate connections read the three Svalgaard threads at Climateaudit.org. That’s a lot of comments, now, and they are often very dense. For the Cliff’s Noters, especially examine Pete’s graph in comment #454 of the Svalgaard #2 thread, and surrounding commentary.
==========================

]]> By: kim http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-15 kim Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:05:59 +0000 http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/02/09/shoddy-journalism/#comment-15 Joe Pappalardo in Popular Mechanics actually does quote Tapping. Tapping's thesis is the same as mine. We both suspect long term cooling. He's seems to believe the CO2 problem will just be worse at the other end when we warm up. I'm convinced we'll have developed better energy sources, and in the meantime, extra CO2 will feed and warm our billions. You pays your money and you takes your chances. ================ Joe Pappalardo in Popular Mechanics actually does quote Tapping.

Tapping’s thesis is the same as mine. We both suspect long term cooling. He’s seems to believe the CO2 problem will just be worse at the other end when we warm up. I’m convinced we’ll have developed better energy sources, and in the meantime, extra CO2 will feed and warm our billions.

You pays your money and you takes your chances.
================

]]>