<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN: the Daily Show is biased</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/05/09/cnn-the-daily-show-is-biased/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/05/09/cnn-the-daily-show-is-biased/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:57:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan Dawson</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/05/09/cnn-the-daily-show-is-biased/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightsideup.org/?p=161#comment-165</guid>
		<description>(posted by user &quot;CNN&quot;)

You want constrictive criticism? Ok.

1. The Associated Press (AP) wrote the story. As a wire service they sell their stories to many members of the media including CNN.
2. The article’s thesis is easy to understand. It’s first sentence!
3. The show is satire. And both your sources say so. Satire by defination is not objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(posted by user &#8220;CNN&#8221;)</p>
<p>You want constrictive criticism? Ok.</p>
<p>1. The Associated Press (AP) wrote the story. As a wire service they sell their stories to many members of the media including CNN.<br />
2. The article’s thesis is easy to understand. It’s first sentence!<br />
3. The show is satire. And both your sources say so. Satire by defination is not objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

