<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rightsideup blog &#187; abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rightsideup.org/category/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rightsideup.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>One-way freedom of speech</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/05/08/one-way-freedom-of-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/05/08/one-way-freedom-of-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rightsideup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightsideup.org/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another classic example of liberals&#8217; one-way interpretation of free speech. Hot Air has covered an event which occurred at University of Wisconsin Stevens Point recently. Some pro-life activists had obtained permission from the University to put up a display of crosses on one of the lawns. Then, a pro-abortion individual came along and started pulling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another classic <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/07/video-pro-life-memorial-destroyed-because-abortions-a-right-and-youre-not-allowed-to-challenge-that/" target="_blank">example</a> of liberals&#8217; one-way interpretation of free speech. Hot Air has covered an event which occurred at University of Wisconsin Stevens Point recently. Some pro-life activists had obtained permission from the University to put up a display of crosses on one of the lawns. Then, a pro-abortion individual came along and started pulling all the crosses down. His defense? Abortion is a constitutional right, so now you don&#8217;t have the right to challenge it.</p>
<p>Why do liberals think free speech only goes one way? Why is only their speech protected? How do they justify this to themselves? In my experience, it&#8217;s often because they see themselves as believing the right things, and so believe that the field of acceptable opinions has them at its center, not at the left-most fringe. As a result, all conservatives and worse are in the unacceptable part of the spectrum. Free speech shouldn&#8217;t really protect all speech, just that speech which falls within the acceptable range. At any rate, not anything that&#8217;s likely to change soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rightsideup.org/2008/05/08/one-way-freedom-of-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
