CNN has really outdone itself this time. In the headline of the main story on the site (at least at time of writing) it describes Tuesday 4 March as “another make-or-break, do-or-die primary day”. Now, I believe this is a make-or-break, do-or-die day for both Hillary Clinton and Mike Huckabee, but how can it be another? Did either of them do well enough last time they held a make-or-break, do-or-die primary day that they could be considered to have made and done whatever was necessary to avoid breaking and dying? By definition, this can’t be “another” one of those days, at least for the candidates still in it. And calling it “critical Tuesday” is not even as amusing as calling the big primary day “Super-Duper Tuesday”. Is it just me, or is CNN trying just a little too hard to make this more exciting?
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 4th, 2008 at 3:51 pm and is filed under cnn, journalism, primaries. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Comments are closed.
Author
I'm a Mormon Republican (but also a Brit) living in the Northeastern US. I will tend to focus on US politics but may occasionally meander over into UK politics. During 2008 I'll be focusing a lot on the presidential elections (and I focused heavily on Mitt Romney while his candidacy lasted).
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- July 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
Categories
- 2008 (21)
- 2012 (6)
- abortion (1)
- admin (1)
- afghanistan (1)
- age (1)
- al gore (3)
- al qaeda (1)
- alan greenspan (1)
- american solutions (1)
- anwr (1)
- barack obama (28)
- bbc (1)
- best of the web (1)
- bias (8)
- big government (4)
- bill clinton (2)
- biofuels (1)
- bjorn lomborg (1)
- business (5)
- canada (2)
- carl bernstein (1)
- chris cox (1)
- church and state (3)
- climate change (17)
- cnn (9)
- congress (4)
- conservatives (3)
- copenhagen consensus (1)
- CPAC (2)
- daily show (2)
- debate (2)
- democracy (2)
- democrats (10)
- denial (1)
- earmarks (1)
- economics (5)
- ed morrissey (1)
- education (1)
- elections (7)
- endorsements (3)
- EU (2)
- evangelicals (2)
- exit polls (1)
- ezra levant (2)
- finance (2)
- financing (1)
- first lady (1)
- florida (2)
- food prices (2)
- foreign oil (1)
- Foreign Policy (6)
- freakonomics (2)
- fred thompson (1)
- free speech (3)
- gaffes (4)
- george bush (5)
- gm (1)
- google (1)
- gordon brown (1)
- harry reid (1)
- hillary clinton (11)
- hollywood (2)
- honesty (1)
- hot air (1)
- immigration (1)
- integrity (1)
- iraq (5)
- ireland (1)
- israel (1)
- jack cafferty (1)
- john edwards (1)
- john mccain (27)
- john stewart (1)
- journalism (9)
- kenneth arrow (1)
- legislation (1)
- lies (1)
- links (2)
- lobbyists (1)
- malapropisms (1)
- marc andreessen (1)
- mark levin (1)
- mark steyn (3)
- media (2)
- michelle obama (1)
- middle class (1)
- middle east (3)
- mike huckabee (6)
- mitt romney (28)
- mormonism (1)
- mortgage crisis (1)
- nafta (2)
- new york times (3)
- newt gingrich (1)
- nobel peace prize (1)
- ny governor (1)
- oil (4)
- palestine (1)
- paul weyrich (1)
- peggy noonan (1)
- police (1)
- political theory (1)
- politics (24)
- polls (5)
- pork (1)
- post-mortem (2)
- primaries (7)
- psephology (1)
- race (1)
- radio (2)
- recession (1)
- religion (3)
- republicans (7)
- rezko (1)
- ronald reagan (2)
- roundup (2)
- rush limbaugh (2)
- scandal (3)
- scandals (1)
- sean hannity (2)
- senate (1)
- speeches (2)
- speed limits (1)
- spitzer (1)
- subprime (1)
- super tuesday (1)
- surge (1)
- talk shows (1)
- taxes (5)
- ted turner (1)
- terrorism (1)
- third parties (1)
- time (2)
- tony blair (2)
- trade agreements (1)
- uk (7)
- UN (3)
- Uncategorized (3)
- vp (6)
- wall street journal (4)
- wikipedia (1)
Comments are closed
Comments are currently closed on this entry.